无可救药爱上你

有时间的话读一下原著吧, Byatt模仿维多利亚时代诗人Robert Browning和美国女诗人Emily Dickenson写的那些戏剧独白和短诗着实精彩, 还有浸泡着浓浓的书卷气的无比含蓄却热烈的书信,读起来浑身鸡皮疙瘩...小拜模拟人物说话写作的水平是一流的.就像她形容男主角Randolph Ash的那样, 是一伟大的ventriloquist

那一只中世纪流传下来的鹅毛笔睡了那么久 尖锐变得圆滑还是说不出 爱情冰河期的冰凌还在心胸生长等待无数的春天飘过黄莺声声 大雁归来依然侧影锋利靠近就鲜血淋淋采集象形文字堆砌深情烧尽真挚的温柔 尝尽世间冷暖 闻过万种心酸看不到清澈流转只能用匹诺曹传达消息我爱你 一千次的高呼没有一次回首 衣袂飘飘 年代走远 找不到亲爱的水晶鞋光着脚 诗句都破碎 光鲜夺目的脸庞飘荡在河畔诗歌破碎成文字 看不到蚊子 只有苍蝇为什么不给我一朵蔷薇一个城堡一个童话的故事为什么就这样让我在凌晨入睡抱紧我所有的文字我最好的自己 它们沉重 我可以携带它们沉湖在湖中种下水草 种下永恒的陪伴等不来一个诗人的问候 让我燃烧你然后燃烧我自己看我 用文字眷念笔尖摇曳的深情残缺 留给你 记下它们记下刻骨铭心

其实我很喜欢他们两个穿着舒服的睡衣躺在大床上说心事的片断。

但俺这种胆小怕事的人，无法容忍两个文学博士的研究方法。

他们每一次研究的突破点不是要依靠从图书馆里偷原始文献，就是从别人办公室里偷他人信件，或从别人家里偷私人信件，最后还要把别人的坟墓抛开，为了争抢挖坟还抱以老拳，肆无忌惮的乱乱翻别人的遗物。

最后当然研究者与被研究者之间还有了血缘关系，所以大家轻易的忘记了之前的偷鸡摸狗。

学术研究到这份上，有点灵魂附体加鸡鸣狗盗的意思了ps：演lizzy的英国女的眼睛还是那么亮a

我不能让你将我点燃，可是我也无力抗拒，没有人能在这样的爱火中不被燃烧。

终于，我执起你的手，把我的手放在你的手心。

一切开始于1859年的一次聚会。

那是伦敦的春夜，风中仍有丝丝寒意，可是肌肤上的每一个毛孔，已经能感受到爱人般让人心醉神迷的呼吸，就像亚西看着克里斯贝的温柔的眼。

他看见的是一张满月的脸庞，流溢着母性智慧包容的光辉，在橙色的灯光下，安全，优雅，如同一场突如其来的梦，亚西像个初生的婴儿，他的灵魂，连同此后的整个生命，就这样轻易地坠了进去。

一百多年后，当来自美国的年轻英国文学研究者米切尔在伦敦的图书馆里无意间发现亚西在那场晚会后写给克里斯贝的情书时，欣喜若狂，又不敢相信。

亚西，这个19世纪的英国人，在后人眼里，从来是一个模范丈夫、天才诗人，与发妻相伴一生，无任何感情不谐的记载。

现在，诗人另外一段感情突然露出了隐约的一角，那个时代的隐秘和克制使它像朵藏于深谷的幽兰，愈发引人遐思。

米切尔一心要揭开这层面纱，他的眼前，不断幻化出诗人为克里斯贝写下这第一封情书的情景，小心，忐忑，像初恋少年般激动不安。

经朋友介绍，他结识了年轻漂亮的莫德，一位研究克里斯贝的英国本土女学者，而且是克里斯贝家族的后裔。

对自己的学术事业非常自负的莫德，起初根本不相信隐居于乡间深居简出，而且有同性恋迹向、一生未婚的女诗人的克里斯贝，会有这样一份不为人知的爱情。

可她还是答应陪同米切尔去克里斯贝的故居试一试，看看能否找到别的证据。

寻找的过程中，反而是她对环境的熟悉和女性的敏感，帮助他们发现了被女诗人秘密收藏了一百多年的一摞情书。

循着情书中的线索，他们追随古人的脚步，重新体验诗人的爱情之旅，甜蜜而忧伤的离合。

在一幕幕爱情的闪回中，莫德和米切尔彼此间的爱意也在潜滋暗长。

这个故事一定让很多人想起了20年前的一部经典爱情片《法国中尉的女人》，戏中戏，时空交错，荡气回肠的电影与缠绵缱绻的情书串连起古典与现代的英式爱情。

珠玉在前，《法国中尉的女人》在对比之中爱情不再的喟叹以及结构、画面的完美都颇难逾越，但《迷梦情缘》显然不想超越什么，也不要那样沉重，它只想表现两段让人心动的爱情。

虽然时空相联的电影技巧也无甚新奇之处，可对于喜欢小情小调的人来说，仍然那么精致可人，甚至是电影里渲染浪漫的最重要手段，在更为精巧的时间转换中，两场爱情跨越一百多年的时光，相互映照，美丽上演。

古堡的阁楼里，手电筒微弱的灯光照出一小片柔和的天地，就像当年静谧的书房里照着相恋的诗人们的那束橙色烛光，穿越时空，轻笼着莫德和米切尔，他们交替读着克里斯贝和亚西的情书，缠绵的情话和爱情的重现中，镜头不断切回到莫德和米切尔温柔的脸上，那段不朽的恋情已经在向他们的心里悄悄传递。

他们驱车去诗人共渡蜜月的乡间，汽车从桥下驶过，桥上，一百多年前的蒸汽火车载着诗人迎面而来，就在一个镜头里，完美地完成了时空的转换。

诗人手拉手走出古老乡村旅馆的木门，门外进来的却是一百多年后他们的两个年轻的仰慕者，轻轻抚摸他们用过的物件，站在他们当年驻足的窗前，呼吸着从一百多年前英格兰田野吹过来的清风。

莫德和米切尔去户外散步，在林中发现了一小块湖水和一道瀑布，莫德凭女人的直觉知道，瀑布后面有个山洞，当年，一定是在这里，两个诗人小心压抑的爱情火苗终于尽情燃烧了。

米切尔就像坠入情网的亚西，孩子气地跳入冰冷的水中去证明她的猜测，莫德静静倾听着从水的那端传来的喊声，脸上的表情细微而动人，恍惚，难以置信，不由自主的感动，镜头慢慢平摇，她的旁边，克里斯贝也在静静听着亚西孩子似的欢呼。

旅程的终点，诗人在车站等火车，克里斯贝撕碎了为这段爱情所写的那些诗歌，因为它们还不足以表达出她的爱，而这份爱只能永远藏在心里。

克里斯贝的女友死了，孩子死了。

我们到底还是知道了，分离和怨恨仍然将如期而至，克里斯贝继续她的隐居生活，亚西要回到深爱的妻子身边。

在车站的转角处，泊着莫德的汽车，产生了分歧的年轻学者也在安静地道别。

很难想象，这个极具英国味的电影竟贴着美国出品的标签，类似一场以虚构的英国诗人为向导的古典英伦梦，优雅的男女，内敛的感情，美丽的英格兰田野，田野里浓得化不开的冷绿，而室内，永远是橙色光线下柔和的脸，温婉而安然的笑容。

演诗人的两个演员杰里米•诺森和詹妮弗•艾莉，我们早已在很多英国古装片中见过他们了，对他们的演技丝毫不用怀疑。

现代的恋人，则由格温尼丝•帕尔特洛和艾伦•艾克哈特扮演，格温尼丝的古典美人所公认，她的活泼灵动和艾克哈特微微的鲁莽直率又使他们的恋情带上了一些现代的色彩。

擅长美国主流温馨喜剧的导演尼尔•莱布特，当然不会让这部电影完全英国化。

为了增强故事性，他在古典爱情里加入了同性恋，爱人的嫉妒，死亡，两个无辜女人的悲剧；现代的爱情，米切尔心底藏着一道爱情旧伤，时时发作，莫德又要面对同事的爱慕和知性的冷静，虽然一路相伴，却总不能一路欢歌。

当然还有一点点美式的喜剧来调味，“邦妮和克莱德”，这是同事对他们的戏称，而他们也当之无愧，夜探古堡，心细如发，互相掩护偷取资料更是拿手好戏，到了最后，竟然还有窥探、掘墓、埋伏的准惊险片桥段，比一般的英国古装片要轻松得多。

莫德和米切尔从教授那里抢回了在地下长伴亚西的铁盒，里面封存有一束秀发、一张年轻女子的相片，和克里斯贝最后一封信，直到亚西长眠也没有看到的信。

他不知道他的女儿还活着，不知道爱人根本就没有恨过他。

可是故事并没有完。

结尾时，亚西来到郊外，在心底呼唤着爱人的名字，希望得到她的原谅。

在一棵冠盖如荫的树下，他遇见了一个也叫克里斯贝的小女孩，看见她的第一眼，他就知道，那是他的女儿。

他让孩子带给克里斯贝阿姨两页他的诗歌，告诉她：“一个诗人想见她，却见到了你。

”而这两页诗和克里斯贝的那封信一样，最终也没有送达，它们落在田野上，在娇嫩的草地上轻轻颤抖片刻，然后随风而去，把甜蜜而忧伤的遗憾，和一场不朽的爱情，永远留在风里，等待相爱的心灵去发现。

Possession: a romance is often considered as a complex suspense novel regarding history of literature and love. The story starts with a twentieth century dead-in-wood scholar Roland who spends all his time studying a poet Ash from the nineteenth century. It appears at the beginning of the novel that this book focuses on the position of males, particularly Roland and Ash, in different social background. However, new highlights are brought into the novel when Roland discovered the love letters between Ash and Christabel, another poet at that time. The author portrays Christabel and Maud Bailey, tow ladies from different times who change to fight for their freedom to discuss the roles of women through out the history, and how the talent and freedom of women was suppressed. Both Christabel and Maud are described in a somehow negative manner when they first appeared in the story. Roland describes the photo of Christabel as “no clear impression of anyone in particular; it was generic Victorian lady, specific shy poetess” (Byatt 44) Similarly, Maud is described as a very ordinary figure. “At first he did not identify Maud Bailey, and he himself was not in any way remarkable” (44). Thus, it can be clearly seen that both Christable and Maud were not considered stunning based on how they looked. Roland even has the impression that Maud “smelled of something ferny and sharp. Roland didn’t like her voice” (44). This shows that most people in the society didn’t appreciate women’s beauty at first sight.Byatt makes lots of hints and metaphor regarding the fact that people didn’t realize the talent and importance of women. Maud Bailey’s hair is blonde and metallic, a gold that might have existed before the discovery of precious metal: As she unbinds her mane "Roland saw the light rush towards it and glitter on it, the whirling mass, and Maud inside it saw a sea of gold lines, waving" (296). This represents Maud’s stunning beauty and talent; however, She wears it covered with a scarf, symbolic of repressed Victorian sexuality. Although Christabel’s hair color (like Maud’s hair and the scintillating waters of the fountain) is metamorphic in hue, we have seen that it contains pale loops of silver-gold (301). Gold – the color of charm, confidence, and power linked two women together in reflecting an essential element of their feminine nature—fertility, confident and attracting. “Mine the bright earth Mine the corn Mine the gold throne To which you’re born Lie in my lap Tumbled with flowers”This is the song of the gold lady who wears a "queenly crown of gold, a filigree turret of lambent sunny gleams and glistering wires above crisping gold curls as heavy with riches as the golden fleece itself" (169). Based upon these parallels, we can conclude that in Possession, women’s wealth — their power and energy — lies in their hair. Even though Christabel’s and Maud’s beauty and power is not recognized, their natural female characters still exist and shine just like the sparkling gold lady.The connection between Maud and Christabel serves also to connect the past to the present, the Victorian to the Post-modern. Feminism is an important aspect in each time period of the novel. Maud is a modern feminist, attempting to balance her identity as a woman with her identity as an academic scholar, and Christabel is trying to overcome her femininity by living as a recluse with another woman before she met R. H. Ash. Similarly, Maud is a withdrawn person, wary of men, and distrustful. Christabel is doing what many women of her time were doing, that is, struggling for masculine freedom in a world that was very limited for a woman. Maud is doing what many women today are attempting to do, that is, trying to reconcile and accept her femininity in an academic, typically male, environment. Byatt plays up this feminist view of literature and society by choosing to base Christabel's poetry on the strongly feminist poetry. She and Maud are living the liberated version – living on their own, being away from the secular society. These all indicate the ways that women fight against the social pressures and choose their own liberate styles to live.Not surprisingly, the light that gold emits cannot be covered up. Eventually, the free soul broke out and the courage pursuing liberty and love beat the fear of being different from others. Christabel and Maud both changed, as they could not reserve their true feelings anymore. In Victorian tradition, it was the man who 'owned' the woman, his wife. Yet in this modern Victorian work, that becomes twisted. When Ash attempts to 'claim' Christabel on page 308 by holding her and making love to her, the act of possession is switched around. He is trying figuratively to grasp her, and 'she was liquid moving through his grasping fingers, as though she was waves of the sea rising all round him.' He tries to take her all in, to know her, and her womanhood eludes him, as personality always will. Byatt's message seems to be that a personality cannot be taken or possessed by someone else, that individuality always remains, even in Victorian situations of female oppression and domination by males. The same love story that defines Christabel and Ash in the 1860's also describes Roland and Maud in the 1980's. Roland gradually changed his impression about Maud and found her extremely charming as a serious scholar and a beautiful independent woman. As two hearts got closer and closer, Maud finally chose to be her true self. She told Roland about her relationship with Fergus, and the reason why she reserved beauty. Then she was convinced to uncover her hair. “The segments of the plaits were like streaked and polished oval stones, celandine yellow, straw-yellow, silvery yellow, glossy with constricted life. Roland was moved—not exactly with desire, but with an obscure emotion that was partly pity, for the rigorous constriction all that mass had undergone, to be so structured into repeating patterns. If he closed his eyes and squinted, the head against the sea was crowned with knobby horns.” (291) This was how Roland felt when he saw Maud’s hair. The incomparable stunning beauty shocked Roland. “Life is so short,” said Roland. “It has a right to breathe.”(291) The courage and desire for love and freedom made them decide to give their love the right to breathe. Through the two love stories, sexuality is also discussed. On page 6, there is a passage on R.H. Ash's poem representing Proserpina, an ideal Greek woman, as 'gold-skinned in the gloom..grain golden… bound with golden links.' This is an example of idealized fertility and sexuality in Victorian women. It represents sexuality as something that can be conquered and possessed, like gold or grain. The suppression of sexuality in the Victorian era is a theme throughout the book, in both time periods, as is the sexual freedom that both couples eventually reach. The sexuality in Victorian society can be traced in Possession.Byatt successfully displays the change of the roles of women through out the history by shifting from the 1860's to the present. The romances are so similar that it is often difficult to tell which couple Byatt is writing about in any given situation. The way this romantic narrative fits both couples and time periods seems to suggest that not so much has changed, and romance from one time to another is not so different as we thought. The characters mix the old and the new; Maud wears a brooch once belonging to Christabel, and another Ash scholar, Mortimer Cropper, carries Ash's pocket watch. In the end of the novel, the last love letter written by Christabel enables Maud to finally enjoy the value of love in the present, and give her trust to Roland. The cyclical time frame of the novel provides an interesting contrast to the normal, stifling, linear time frame of typical literature and everyday life. Possession, a novel with lots of feminism color, does a good job in portraying two female characters from different times to call for the respect and attention for women from the society. Christabel and Maud are two respectable females who set an example for women to be who they want to be and gain respect and love they deserve.

午后, 一杯菊花清茶, 重温这部电影大片大片英格兰的冷绿泌人心脾淡淡馨香经久不散古今两段情缘在交织的时空中缓缓展开婉若片中行云流水般的诗篇ture love is a durable fire in the mind ever buring

看Possession的中文版小说，断断续续的看了一半，因为晦涩的诗词而不得不停顿，无意中发现电影版，便迫不及待的拿来欣赏其实就是一段婚外恋，难道因为它是真爱所以就美好，就值得被同情？

对妻子的爱是责任，对情人的爱是激情，统统冠以爱的名义。

爱太泛滥。

我最爱不起的男人就是对这妻子说我不会和你离婚的，你是我的的责任，我会照顾你一生，然后转头对着情人说，我跟我老婆没有爱情，就只有亲情，我的心都在你身上，但是我不能抛弃一路甘苦与共的糟糠之妻。

说穿了这种男人就是一个自私鬼，两手都要抓还要向世界要同情。

只是不明白为什么女人都容易沉浸在自己编织的美好里，自欺欺人的去相信自己是那个独一无二的存在，还傻傻的为男人寻找各种借口。

想要两全的终不能两全，忧伤带出来的感动和美好倒是能赚足一大把的眼泪。

夏天的气息着实的感受到了，在这样安静是午后看完这部电影，像是读了一章很长的诗篇。

安静，唯美，哀伤···两个故事，两对情人。

忧伤而婉转的爱。

隔着心的距离，你是否知道我爱的盛大？

朴实的通过书信的表达，很有感觉，是否现在还有这样单纯的爱情。

结尾散落在风中的信笺拉长了那一段惆怅可是，至少，我们都爱过

一部美国人拍的英国味十足的电影。

讲述了一段湮没在时间之中的爱情。

一个是男诗人，拥有幸福的家庭、悠闲绅士的生活和深爱的妻子。

另一个是女诗人，与女伴一起隐居在乡间，生活平静，祥和温婉。

但仅仅是一次社交晚会的相遇，就开始了一段互相迷恋辉映的岁月。

让人怦然心动的，是伊们相遇时专注着、闪着亮光的眼神。

男诗人的生活幽雅而富足，却也有着不平凡的感情经历。

他以优美而专一的爱情诗闻名于世，但他深爱的妻子因为疾病，使得伊们只能有精神之爱，更无法拥有孩子。

女诗人的过往犹如英国乡间的晨雾，但从她的同性伴侣和隐居生活来看，也是遭遇过磨难，经历过艰难的选择才换来的平静生活。

可是因为一次相遇，伊们就被彼此吸引了。

在相遇的最初，她对他说：“令人惊讶的是你，你的诗中竟然未曾注意到任何女性的存在。

你的诗作极少提及女人。

”他回答：“你击中我了，女士。

”……然后是一段逐渐加温的书信往来，直到她感觉到危险——“我不能让你将我烧尽……”但，“我不能让你将我烧尽，也不能拒绝你”，虽然“没有人，能站在火中而不被毁灭”……然后，是相约在花市的会面，当“我们走向彼此的那一刻，此生从未感觉过如此专注”“我牵起你的手，我的手在你的手中，有着相信和信赖”他沉静的，似乎有点忐忑又有点幼稚的问：“你后悔么？

”她微笑着，美丽的脸上有着无法用语言可以表达的神采，“我该后悔但我没有，最理性的时候都不曾后悔”然后，她继续歪着头，把难题轻轻的抛向他：“现在怎么办？

”他上前一步，轻轻捏着她的手：“我不想破坏你的生活，明天上午我会去教堂，用我最诚挚的祈祷，祈望你跟我同去约克郡旅行——我们在这世界上，一段迟来的旅程”在火车上，他欠身，然后问：“你希望分开住宿么”……“不跟我住在一起？

”她很果决的说：“我要跟你同住”“我们之前就决定了”“这四个礼拜，是属于我们的”“只有我们”伊们互相注视着，带着掩藏不住的笑意。

他从口袋里掏出一样东西，“希望你接受这个戒指”她笑着除下手套，“我也带了戒指给你”“你看，证明我的决心”…………两位研究者发现了两位诗人的书信，一个男人，一个女人。

两人在阅读诗人们的书信，时而会心微笑，时而有所触动。

两人跟随诗人的旅途，住在了同一间房间，两人躺在一张床上，交谈着。

男人说：“我不允许自己有伊们这样的关系”，“嫉妒、迷恋这种东西，再也不要”“那你很幸运，这些只给人，一团乱麻”“很多人都要这种纠缠，我可不要我的表现让很多人不快乐，非常不快乐”女人说：“对于我，一旦我对谁有感觉，我就全身发冷”“为什么？

”“大概是害怕吧，害怕被爱情烧毁”男人忽然感慨：“我们在说些什么呢？

”“对啊，我们还算是现代人吗”男人看着女人，然后说：“你该把头发放下，让它呼吸。

别假装冷漠，不必担心我”“她（女诗人）说，提防所有男人”“她不认识我，我对你没有任何企图”“那我们很安全”“对”然后伊们彼此注视了一会，然后亲吻……女人想要掀开被子，男人却退却了，女人恼怒的离开。

第二天，两人继续追寻诗人们的旅途，然后，在车站告别。

男人回去后，和朋友说起这个故事，朋友扔过车匙，“开我的宝时捷去找她吧” 女人开门，看见男人拿着一束花，她笑了。

“进来，让我解释”“你确定？

让我进来？

”“对，很确定。

”两个人在窗前坐下来，互相注视着对方。

“你到底来干什么？

”男人有点不好意思，但还是看着她，然后说：“我必须看见你”“我想告诉你那天晚上发生的事情。

”“那时，我只是不想陷进去”“我很想，真的很想…那么做”女人微笑“非常想”女人笑出了声音，从红唇间露出她雪白的牙齿。

“但我不想把事情搞砸”女人看着他，像在鼓励他继续说下去。

“我想搞清楚，我想知道你我之间”“到底…有没有可能”女人继续微笑着，嘴唇抿着，看着他。

他也看着她。

“这样说…可以吗？

”女人向他俯去，亲吻他……他轻轻捏着她的下巴：“我想你是接受了”…………这两段故事构成了整个影片的上半部分，下半部分，感兴趣的人可以自己去看……possession1. 拥有;占有[U]The possession of a degree does not guarantee you a job.拥有一个学位不能保证你找到工作。

2. 所有物;财产[P]Her possessions could fit in one suitcase.她的全部财物可以装在一个手提箱内。

3. 领地,属地,殖民地[C][P1]Some Caribbean islands are still French possessions.一些加勒比岛屿至今仍是法国的领地。

4. 自制,镇定自若[U]With his usual possession, he answered all the questions.他以那惯常的沉着回答了所有的问题。

5. 着魔[U]This charm will protect a man from possession by evil spirits.这个护身符将保护人不致着魔。

看完之后心里很难过，很遗憾。

鲁迅先生曾经说过：悲剧将人生的有价值的东西毁灭给人看，喜剧将那无价值的撕破给人看。

也许是我太感性了吧，不过我不能否认这样的结局很完美。

喜欢片子穿插的基调——优雅的男女，内敛的感情，美丽的英格兰田野，一百多年前的蒸汽火车，橙色光线下柔和的脸庞，温婉而安然的笑容。

喜爱这部片子的朋友，也推荐你看朗读者（THE READER）